Friday, May 30, 2008

Miller seeks to ban all guns in Toronto

Miller seeks to ban all guns in Toronto taken from CFRB, radio 1010 in Toronto

Tue, 2008-05-27 16:46.
Iain Grant
Miller seeks to ban all guns in Toronto
No Guns
Mayor David Miller says he wants all guns out of Toronto.

Though handguns are supposedly the target of the bylaw, there is no distinction between handguns and rifles or shotguns used in legal hunting and target practice.

This is Left wing political posturing at its worst. The city owns 2 pieces of property that are leased to gun clubs, and they want them out.

Bill spoke with Mike Bennett, president of the Scarborough Rifle Club. The club is the only facility of its kind between Mississauga and Ajax.


Listen THIS IS WELL WORTH LISTENING TO

OFAH FILE: 842
May 30, 2008
For Immediate Release

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Toronto Mayor escalates vendetta against legal firearms and firearms owners
Restrictions on gun ranges and clubs pointless exercise in war against gun crime
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Not content to rest on his laurels and his ill-fated pursuit of a ban on handguns as a means of stopping gun crime in Toronto, Mayor David Miller has now turned his sights on legal, law abiding recreational sport shooters, which will impact upon shooters like Avianna Cho, a member of the Canadian Olympic team headed for Beijing in August.

A report entitled, "City of Toronto: City-Based Measures to Address Gun Violence" will be considered by the powerful Executive Committee of Council on June 3, 2008. The Planning and Growth Committee will consider a zoning bylaw on September 10, 2008.

"By canceling the leases of the Scarborough Rifle Club and the CNRA Gun Club at Union Station, and targeting law-abiding firearms owners, manufacturers and distributors, the Mayor is once again laying the blame for escalating gun crime in Toronto at the doorstep of the legal, heavily regulated, licensed and trained firearms community, instead of focusing his efforts on addressing the real causes of these crimes," said Jack Hedman, President of the Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters.

Earlier attempts by Mayor Miller to ban handguns, which are ostensibly already banned and tightly controlled, have failed to impress the federal government, who rightly pointed out that the measures being pursued under their recently passed crime bill, including increased border enforcement, more police on the street and more stringent use of sentencing provisions for gun crimes, will more effectively target the root causes of gun crimes.

The O.F.A.H. is alarmed by the fact that the Mayor either doesn't understand the problem, or worse still, doesn't want to understand, having found an easy and convenient scapegoat for the ills that plague his city. Legal, law-abiding firearms owners should not be the focus of his crusade, when it's the access to and use of illegal firearms by criminals and gang members to commit crimes that needs to be addressed. Worse still, the Mayor makes statements that are not reflective of reality, and conflict with statements made by his own Chief of Police who told the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Justice that close to 80percent of seized firearms have been smuggled in across the border. The Mayor's inflammatory rhetoric, including irrational statements that guns are 'routinely' stolen from 'so-called' legal owners and are responsible for the glut of guns on the streets of Toronto may play well on the six o'clock news, but are a gross misrepresentation of fact.

"Make no mistake, while the report going before the Executive Committee is referred to as a 'staff' report, the Mayor's fingerprints are all over it," said Mr. Hedman. "Fortunately, several Toronto Councillors see this for what it is, and have rightly characterized the Mayor's vilification of the legal firearms community as nothing more than 'cosmetic', 'political junk food' and 'an insult to law abiding citizens'.

The suggestion that legal shooting clubs, and recreational sport shooters are in anyway responsible for the ongoing spate of gun crimes in Toronto is dismissed by others, including the Deputy Chief Firearms Officer for Ontario, who noted that he has received absolutely no complaints about either of the clubs targeted by the Mayor. The Deputy CFO also stated that the closure of ranges and attempts to ban recreational firearms from Toronto won't stop legal owners from joining clubs elsewhere in the GTA, nor will it prevent them from owning, purchasing and continuing to use firearms in a safe, legal and regulated manner.

The Mayor's demonization of legal firearms owners, and his insistence on casting them as the villains of this piece is particularly disturbing, since a review of legal firearms ownership in Ontario clearly demonstrates that the GTA, and in particular the City of Toronto, has the fewest number of legal, registered firearms anywhere in Ontario. If this doesn't tell him that it's not the legal firearms owners who are responsible for the carnage on the streets of Toronto, then what will? In 2005, on 4 of 129 homicides were committed with a registered firearm, and 6 of 108 in 2006. What does it take for the Mayor to understand that it is the use of illegal, unregistered firearms that are available on any street corner, that are the problem?

It's time that Mr. Miller put an end to the empty oratory and actually turned his attention to the real issue at hand. It's also time that he stopped portraying legal, responsible, law-abiding recreational shooters like Avianna Cho as the villains, who are not now, nor have they ever been, part of the problem. In light of two recent public opinion polls, one conducted by Toronto radio station AM640, in which 94 percent of respondents said that the Mayor's proposals won't curb gun violence; and a second on Victoria radio station CFAX1070, in which 95 percent responded that it makes no sense to ban responsible gun use is safe settings, the public seems to have an equally jaundiced view of the Mayor's proposal.

The bottom line is this: gun bans in countries like England, Australia, Wales, Jamaica and others has not reduced gun crime, in fact, the opposite has occurred. Similarly, the proposal to shut down legal recreational shooting ranges and banning firearms companies from setting up shop in Toronto will not stop criminals and gangs from acquiring illegal firearms and committing crimes.

If the Mayor ever puts forward a practical idea that actually makes sense and will make a difference, legal firearms owners are likely to step up and support him. Until then, he should put his time to better uses and spare us the useless window dressing.

With 83,000 members and 655 member clubs, the O.F.A.H. is the largest, nonprofit fish and wildlife conservation organization in Ontario.

Contact

Greg Farrant
Manager, Government Relations
705 748-6324
705 875-0274 (cell)

Lezlie Goodwin
Communications Coordinator
705 748-6324 ext 270



------------------------------------------------------------
You are receiving this message as you have signed up to receive electronic updates from the website of the Ontario Federation of Anglers & Hunters ( www.ofah.org ).



Thursday, October 18, 2007

We can rely on the politicians to do right by us.

FALSE WITH ONE RESERVATION. The federal Liberals, the Bloc, the NDP and the Ontario Liberals have clung to their anti-firearms ownership stance in the face of overwhelming evidence that gun registration has not and will not result in a safer society. They have chosen the cheap and easy solution of being seen to do something as preferable to taking proven steps to decrease street crime through the provision of more policing resources where they are needed, better control at our borders to stop the importation of handguns from abroad and social programs aimed at drying up the source of gang recruitment.

The Conservative Party of Canada is the only party that has had the integrity to stand up and publicly condemn the gun registry, in its present form, as a failure and a waste of precious tax dollars. Their position will require further education of the general public as to the correctness of their stand. They are the only party that has acted in the public's best interest in this matter.

Liberal Party gun control legislation is based on fact.

FALSE. The anti-firearms ownership lobby live in a state of denial and have a blind faith that is akin to religion. Their rhetoric is characterized by scare mongering, propaganda and the frequent quotation of anonymous police sources. They totally ignore the failure of gun bans in other countries like the U.K. and Australia while at the same time making outrageous claims of success. They ignore examples of low crime in countries like Switzerland that has a much higher per capita ownership of firearms than Canada. They often quote the Chiefs of Police Assoc. as supporting the gun registry but ignore the fact that police from all levels and services have said the gun registry is unreliable and incomplete or erroneous thus rendering it dangerous to rely upon. There is not one example of the registry solving a crime!

Liberal Party gun control legislation is based on proven science.

FALSE. The Firearms Act and Regulations were a knee jerk reaction to the publics horror over the Montreal massacre. The legislation was hurredley framed with no significant input from the sport shooting community. The legislation made grand claims for results that have not been realized. Costs are out of control with the current cost being in excess of two billion dollars and climbing.

The Gun Registry is worth it if it saves one life.

FALSE. For two billion dollars we have a program with no PROVABLE results. There is no positive cost/benefit analysis to prove this contention. This fact is contrary to the Liberal government's own approved Treasury Board requirements.

The Gun Registry saves lives.

FALSE. Statistics Canada numbers do not support such a claim. Nor has it been proven in any other venue.

Firearms registration was a Liberal Party initiative in 1995..

FALSE. There has been registration of handguns in Canada since 1934.